Tuesday, May 29, 2018

N is for NGS Conference (but mostly the penquin portfolio)_

NGS - aka National Genealogical Society - held their yearly conference in Grand Rapids the beginning of May 2018.  Lots of people, lots of vendors, and lots of lectures with many ideas of all sorts flowing around.  A great time of listening, learning and meeting people, known by face and known by name, and the incredible time of asking questions and having time to explore genealogical situations.  Whew -- and, as always, way too short. 

Penguin (still no first name) travels with me, and I invite people to poise with penguin and join the pengiun portfolio.  (and yes, if the person is pictured, they have given their permission...) 


Enjoy -- whimsy is good. 




Grand Rapids is a beautiful city.  Compact and varied downtown, LOVELY convention center, good and wide ranging restaurants, and the river, with convention center on one side and Gerald Ford Library on the other.   There was so much that I saw around the fringes, that I have put Grand Rapids on my "return and see much more of the town."


Till next time,
Liz




main hall of convention center





one of the many gracious & helpful volunteers -- 








*** notice that everyone holding a penguin is smiling?!! ***




Last Look -- see you next year
8-11 May 2019 - St. Charles, MO
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  © 2018, SE Ross



Tuesday, May 22, 2018

L is for LOCKSS


In the wake of Hurricane Harry*** – L is for LOCKSS.  “lots of copies keep stuff safe.”  Go old school with photo copies sent to your three 2nd cousins living in two different directions.  Go medium tech with scans on a stick.  Go cloud, go “finish the book and send it to Allen County.”

               (I did not invent this saying, but believe the idea should get about, and I would be very happy to credit the person who sparked LOCKSS, but I really don't remember where or from who I heard this.)

In the olden days, documents were one of a kind, as were photos.  Getting copies was time-consuming, often expensive, and often not possible. Not so now.
I do my family research in the vacuum of records lost on both sides of my own family. On one side, two households were basically trashed

I am the descendant (on one side) of two house “explosions” in the same generation.  In the first, the sister of the deceased cleared the house in a weekend.  The car went north with two kids, one suitcase each, and the sterling flatware.  The second was the death of the sister, whose apartment was cleared by daughter in law, flying cross country, and having no room and no interest in family pictures or documents.

So…. Get moving… make copies… send about … you have NO excuse.

Till next time,
Liz

*** and the many other natural disasters since Harry. 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross

L is for Lineage Societies


The premise of lineage societies is that an ancestral line can be tracked back to 'x' (a category of people, or someone famous…or someone infamous) through direct ancestors (read blood line).

This is a situation where it is "just the facts m'am," though you may well have to go far (or very far) afield to get the proofs required for the linkage.  For each generation it must be proved that person 'x' was born to parents 'a' & 'b,'  and usually that a & b were married to each other.  All those other things that make interesting tales around the campfire - occupation, migration, other children -- are not necessary for the lineage, though they may be called upon to prove the lineage.
And when one parent child triangle is proved, take the parent who is headed the right direction, treat the parent as the child and form another triangle with parents.  In other words…rinse and repeat.

DAR (Daughters of the American Revolution) & Mayflower Society (descendants of the colonists who arrived on the Mayflower) are venerable US lineage societies.  These two, and many others celebrate the history and settling of the US. 
My paternal grandmother was DAR, and I may follow her lead.

I am also aware that many states have a "First Families" designation.  New England goes one step further, offering a First Families of New England designation to all who can prove first family in each New England state.  It's tough. 

Family friends belong to a society that is open to descendants of President's wives.  This society allows collateral connections -- so the potential pool of members is HUGE. 

At the same time, against the serious are a whole raft of "tongue-in-cheek" lineage societies, for which one has to prove descendancy from a pirate, a witch, or a black sheep, to name a few.  I must admit I have a soft spot in my heart for these who honor the diversity of our heritage in this manner … and note my personal favorite, encountered at a Scottish Highland games some years ago.  This is the "Venerable Order of the Flamingo." To join you are required to wear a flamingo hat, and while standing on one leg and flapping one's arms, repeat the oath of the order, vowing to protect and value flamingos forever and always, whether of flesh and blood and feathers or of plastic and wire and paint.   It was a moving ceremony; obviously I have not forgotten it, though I have no idea what happened to my membership parchment.

Till next time,
Liz
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published usually on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross

J is for "Just," as in "just one more..."


J is for “just,” as in “just one more ….”  This is the cry of the never finished research.  Be brave, take a stand, finish a small bit and distribute it however you intended – to family, to a local genealogical society, to friends who are cheering you on.  Might your conclusions be amended when more records are found in a church attic…perhaps.  But for today, for now, you have done everything “right,” and the world deserves to see (and possibly point out something you didn’t know!).

I may start using a footnote in reports for myself that reads TDL aka "to do later."  A fact found creates a question to be answered, but… answering that question is not central to the story/question that is on the table, and therefore TDL. 


Till next time,
Liz

"things" in April & early May.  I'm back...

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published usually on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross


Tuesday, March 27, 2018

J is for Jewelry


Jewelry is small, fraught with memories and family connections, passed down through generations, and usually really,  really pretty.

It behooves every genealogist to have a sit-down with each of their relatives, especially the women, and take an annotated stroll through their baubles.

My jewelry box includes a wedding band engraved with my grandparent's names and wedding date, and a ring given to my mother on her 16th birthday (along with the story about how it was presented, in a set of 16 nested boxes, the smallest a ring box, and the largest the size of a toilet paper carton).  I also have my great grandmother's embroidery scissors, the only item remaining from her dresser set,  and the ID bracelet my father had engraved with his name and military serial number.  (Old school; now the military uses Social Security numbers as ID's.)  I wear the rings from time to time, and use the scissors when I sew. 

As part of your recording, be sure to include items that were added to the collection by the person doing the talking.  I often wear ring with overlapping leaves, chosen as a celebration of my work in genealogy.  It's not a particularly valuable piece of jewelry, but the story makes it valuable to my family's history.  Another favorite was bought on holiday with husband Bob.

And of course, you are going to take good clear pictures of the jewelry, and LOCKSS the resultant record -- :-)

Till next time,
Liz

(L is for LOCKSS... stay tuned)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross

I is for Immigration


OK, so that is a gimmee. Start researching and the basic information collected enlarges from birth, marriage, death,  to birth, marriage, death and "new place."

Even though cold in Chicago, the first day of spring was this past week, and that induces thoughts of buds and green leaves, of planting and enjoying flowers, all images of "new growth." 

Immigration… the same.  Immigration for many (most?) included the hope, the belief that things would be better in the new place -- house, county, country -- and therefore the willingness to undertake both the considerable bother, and the considerable expense of moving.  [I know, technically the first two moves are emigration, but the point is still true.]  Leaving "the old country" might well be prompted due to duress -- the potato famine, pogroms, wars, conscription -- but the other side of the coin was the tied belief that the "new country" would offer better options.  Hard probably, extremely hard, perhaps, but still, for whatever reason, or reasons, better options than the current situation in "the old country" had on the table.

And let's be honest.  The "standard" mental image of immigrants is the Ellis Island era, the "tired and poor" arriving with their possessions in bundles and chests.  This was true, for thousands.  But … immigration is not done.  YoYo Ma immigrated, and became a US citizen: his naturalization card is on Ancestry.  My friend and banker immigrated from Vietnam.  

Additionally, enlarge your mental construct past the US-centric sphere, where all roads lead to USA shores.  Historically, and now, people leave the US as well come to the US, and move between other countries (which shouldn’t surprise..)  And many traveled with a stop-over, months, years, a generation, before arriving in the US. (ie. England --> Canada --> US).   If you can make a case for a certain immigration route, it probably happened, at least once.

**********************
Practicum: When your immigrant ancestors are recent enough for you to know the European hometown, and you have living known relations in that town, get out your saving information tools, asap.  Get all the documents, BMD, and pictures of all people/houses/churches/farms.  You have a great gift waiting to be tied up with a bow.

When you don't have recent immigrant ancestors, hit the 1900/1910 US census, and check the Naturalization column, which may produce a homerun to the tiny hometown named as birthplace on the naturalization application/certificate.  Ditto for the obit, and look for the obit not only in the appropriate English newspaper, but also look at the native language paper published for that area.  (and don't forget to check the obit of sibs.)   And,… look for every scrap of paper that relates to these people on this side of "the pond."  Everything that you find will be useful if not vital.

"May the road rise up to meet you. 
May the wind always be at your back
May the sun shine warm upon your face, 
and rains fall soft upon your fields."  
Traditional Irish blessing.

Till next time,
Liz

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross

Friday, March 16, 2018

H is for History

H is for history.  People live in a context.  Now, then, and in the future.  I like to think that reading lots of science fiction prepared me for genealogy, because while the people in these alternative realities are often human (or mostly so), their contexts made different paths and choices the norm.  (cf. Handmaid’s Tale; any Heinlein, Ribbon World, I Robot series).  So read.  Maybe science fiction, maybe not.  Certainly read the histories of the location, and for the late 19th century you have the bonus of easily reading the history of a place which was written in that time (aka county histories).  Read not only the novels written in that time,  but also read speeches given and newspapers written at that time (not only the obits), and as possible the school books used.  All will reveal a world with different suppositions, different mental constraints, which are as powerful or more powerful than physical or legal constraints.  If all women KNOW that they cannot live as single women, …. If every tailor’s son KNOWS that he will become a tailor…

"you cannot do what you cannot imagine"

A great way to jump start entering another time is to visit one of the encampments which do first person interpretation.  Join the population of Plymouth Plantation, Massachusetts, where Goodwife Abigail is sure that it is the rose infused oil and not the temple rubbing which eases her husband's head aching, and all are sure that God has blessed their enterprise because their town has not been afflicted with any of the great illnesses (cholera, diphtheria).  Travel a different direction and spend a day in Conner Prairie. When I visited there (over a decade ago) the entire town was on one script, years before the Civil War, and living life in middle Indiana.  The buildings for the town were gathered from all over Indiana, set down just north of Indianapolis, and the year depicted was around 1857.  You strolled the town, learning that you could barter a woven coverlet (not sewn together) for siding for a house, or $4. cash.  And where the general store, run by Mr. Terwilliger (no joke), was stocking ready-made shirts, but he "can't really believe that people will buy them because they certainly won't fit right."

Now the situations above are across decades and centuries, but closer to my time the same appeared in my family and possibly (probably?) in yours.  One grandmother lived in a mental world where she believed she needed her father's permission to do the big; she wanted to be a teacher, and her father wouldn't permit her to attend university.  She stayed home and worked in the family store till she married; her three brothers went to university. The other grandmother and great aunt lived in a family/world that believed in educating daughters, and they did go to college, and taught high school, and did this in a town that was 60 miles away from their hometown … [until marriage, because that was the world then.]  Their father was an entrepreneur and engineer, and also he had two daughters. 

Yes, for successful research, you do need to know county formation, and starting dates for various documents, but I think it also matters how far one could travel in 4 hours, what the family did for a fever, and what was used for light after sundown (and how much that light cost).


There is a most interesting novel titled "Time and Again."  The book postulates that there are thousands of threads that connect you to your present time, everything from the fibers in your clothing, to food ingredients & food preparation options, to how you travel, and continues the supposition (necessary for the plot) that if you can break those threads you can walk around the corner, and be in that other time. 


On a personal note, while I think that 1900 or 1720 would be lovely for a visit, but I will stay in 2018, despite the many current difficulties.  I appreciate greatly that food is available all year, my home is warm in winter, antibiotics are known, computers aide my work, and occasionally I learn or vege with TV.   You?

Till next time
Liz

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, any letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross

Thursday, March 8, 2018

G is for Grunt Work


Every discipline has it.  Skaters have school figures; musicians have scales and etudes; football players drill and watch films, take ballet class & yoga, visual artists do endless color studies & sketches, and so on, and so on. 
And what does the grunt work get you?  A trained body, a trained eye, or ear, and always a trained and disciplined mind, which controls all the rest.  Grunt work gives you mastery of the medium, so that you can forget the "how you do it" and just do.  

CS Lewis said that as long as you are counting 1,2,3 you are not dancing.  

So should genealogy be able to avoid grunt work?  It can't.  Genealogical research is a discipline, more of the mind than the body, (though being able to sit long and continue to concentrate certainly counts on the body side.)

Genealogical scales & etudes also includes organizing the information (and often includes figuring how to organize the info for "this particular situation").  Information is so much fun to collect, and revel in, and amaze your friends and family, and do the "look Ma!"  thing, but that is only half.  The second part is doing what needs be done to integrate each wonderful morsel into the web of a long-ago life, and that often (dare I say usually) includes grunt work.

Currently I am working on a large lineage project.  Some of my notes go back to 1998; that's a long time in dog years, or research years, and a long time to work on one project.  Yes, it is my family, and so that time-line can be tolerated, but not forever.  It's now time to tie up all the ends.  For this particular project that includes getting every piece of information in chronological order to facilitate (great word, huh..) discerning all the cross connections, as in "How old was Billy (baby of the family) when oldest sister Helen married and moved to Oregon?"

With some of the information in my files that process has to move back one step (or two or three) because before I get to analyze the data found, I get to play detective to discover the date and source of … say "great aunt Sally's" obit.  I have a copy of the obit, which was torn out of the middle of a newspaper page, Xeroxed and sent around.  There is no date on the page, printed or written.  There is no header to offer the name of the paper.  Am I glad to have the obit? Absolutely.  Do I want (do I need) more than her name, survived by, and what cemetery gets her?  Absolutely -- both to satisfy my curiosity, and to meet current research standards.  This happens, and rarely solicits a "Look, Ma!"  More likely a grump, and definitely Grunt Work.

Do you remember your university orientation meeting in the huge hall with a row of profs on stage?  Do you remember the comment that "for every hour in class, you should expect to spend 4 hours on homework"?  Ditto for "Genealogy Done Right."  Read "researching" rather than "in class," and "analyzing and citing" rather than "homework," though it is homework, in the truest definition.

Ah yes, a pain in the keister but the reward is a Flight of the Bumblebee, a flipped omelet that doesn't land on the stove-top, elegant and engaging prose, or a strong, sturdy, and totally reliable family tree.  

My grandfather was a noted southern Illinois basketball coach who told his players, "We can do it if we are willing to work and work hard."  And let the genealogists say, "Amen."


Till next time,
Liz

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  

© 2018, SE Ross

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

F is for Facts & Fixed Format


Facts/Truths in genealogy can (and do) change.  Facts in genealogy are not "forever and always," but rather "with the evidence available currently, (and applying GPS), this is the best answer to the question asked, and therefore, for now, this is the answer, this is the fact."

Used to be that facts in the social sciences were squooshy, but facts in the physical sciences were solid, as in 2 + 2 = 4, always and forever more….
And then Einstein (before my time) changed the way the world was considered…
And then Pluto lost its Planetness… 
And extreme exploration adds new species and even new genus.  Go figure. Now both sides of the fence have flux. 

For me, the take away for genealogy is to "do your homework," hit the usual suspects, and any/all that are suggested from those, and consider everything carefully, using all the brains you are given, and come to some conclusions, and put those conclusions in a fixed format.  Notice that I didn't say "write a report," though that is my personal orientation.  This fixed format could be a collection of pictures, (of course with captions), or a recording of your conclusions, or any combination… as you wish.  The magic is a fixed format.  Why?  Because that fixed format can be shared with family, others researching the same, and also available to the you that you will be in 10 years from now when your genealogy travels have you circling back to these people or this place.  Additionally, with a fixed format, it is possible to broadcast your conclusions more widely, which could assist others in their research, who in turn could send you information/ their conclusions/facts which could open additional doors for you. 

Used to be that genealogical research was directed toward finding b,m,d, FACTS... and also, usually concentrated on following the male (surname) line.  After those dates/places were found, and verified (GPS), they were put on the pedigree chart and the family group sheet.  Up anchor, and on to the next person/family.

Today's genealogist certainly wants these bench marks, and/but is also very likely to be interested in the larger family and how they lived, so the information gathered is more diverse, as are the sources consulted, and that's a good thing. 

(My current all-time wonderful writing is "Water-Powered Grist Mills of Western Pennsylvania," an article found through PERSI, and offering great information on my ancestor Rentchler/Rengler.  Anyone out their related to them?)  

Honesty in blogging requires me to say that I have a lot more information out of fixed format than in.  However, that is changing... 

for another time…
Facts that may start squooshy, and which may stay squooshy, and be ok.

Till next time,
Liz

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross

Friday, February 23, 2018

CENSUS FRIDAY - street number, dwelling number, family number

Primer time: (If you know this cold, jump to ***.) 
Directly to the left of the first name of each family enumerated, most of the census years carry 3 columns with numbers.  In order they are "street number," "dwelling number," and "family number."  (In the early census', there are 2 columns.)

Street number is the numbers part of the address; the street name is written vertically just inside the left margin.  Combine and "walla" you know their postal address.  No biggie, street addresses are understood, and still used for bills, birthday cards, and shipments from Amazon. 
  
Dwelling number and family number may need a bit of explanation.  When a census taker started on his/her area (as defined by the header at the top of the page) the first family contacted lived at dwelling #1 and is also family #1.  On to the next house.  That house is labeled dwelling #2, and the family is also family #2.   The next dwelling is a 2-flat. Now the census taker is looking at ONE building, so this is dwelling #3, but inside this building live two distinct families, who become families #3 and #4.  Next is another 2-flat: dwelling #4, families #5 & #6.  Rinse & repeat for each.
 
                NB.  Sometimes it gets interesting in those U-shaped apartment buildings in cities.  The building may have 5-8 doorways, all emptying out into the courtyard, which is the interior of a U or an L.  Often each door has a different address, with 6-8 families off that one doorway (3-4 floors, with one apartment on each side of the stairway rising from the street).   Sometimes this is enumerated as ONE dwelling with the street address of 102-122 Jefferson, and each family counted separately.  I have also seen it, however, where each doorway is considered its own dwelling, with each family counted.  This second makes it harder to keep track of who is really where, and what sort of neighborhood is really there.  I go to Google maps, and often the building is still there, but if that particular building has turned into a library, the neighborhood will offer suggestions -- comparing what you see on Google maps to how that next address with a U-courtyard was enumerated. 

*** So why do we care about these numbers, dwelling and family, which seem to be something devised to give the census takers one more column to fill out?

  • In the early census' and continuing in rural areas where there weren't street addresses, dwelling/family numbers signaled an extended family living in that one building.
  • In areas with 2-3 families at one address, flares should go up to look for family connections between the different floors of the building.  In Chicago, easily through the 1980's, and even into the 2000's, generations were divided by floor.  The grandparents would live on the first floor (easier in and out), one of their children, with kids of their own, would be on the 2nd floor, and perhaps a cousin would be in a studio carved out of the basement.
  • Looking at the spread between dwelling number and family number offers clues to the density of the area.
  • If you think that your family was missed, you can go into micro mode, and plot the route taken by the enumerator by plotting the addresses as they were recorded.  It's a long shot, but when you are looking for straws…

Three columns, and absolutely not as interesting as the names and ages, and birth places, and all the other facts that you can slam into the pedigree charts and family group sheets, but when you are done with that, and ready to think about the less obvious relationships -- or when you are totally frustrated because everyone seemed to have gone to Mars -- have a look at those three columns.

Till next time,
Liz
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross

Tuesday, February 20, 2018

E is also for Extended Family

Chain migration, 3(or 4?) generation households, the maiden aunt in the back bedroom, the maiden aunt, or sister, or cousin, who stepped in to tend the household and the children when the wife died, the orphan children who joined the household when their parents died.  

1950-60 was all about the nuclear family - mom, dad & 2.5 kids, and now?  Propose a combination, and it will likely be found, not just one place, but many.   Current society may not want to label it as such, but the pendulum has swung and again, people are living in extended families - choice, economics, a combination of the two.

OK, back to historical genealogy.

Extended families, the ones genealogists are tracking, the historical ones, usually were the result of some sort of family connection.  Let your ears prick up at the outlier in the record, whether the pointer be difference in age, name, where born, or occupation, follow and make that picture, and you may well find another branch or collateral relations. 

Additionally, let your imagination roam a little.  People were (and are) where they were (and are) for a reason.  The reason may not be self-evident to us 21st century people, but the reason made sense to them (time travel time again). 
My husband's grandfather, Quill, married and moved in with family of his new wife; now two surnames in the household.  Quill also went to work for his new father in law, James, in his linoleum store (1930).  By the 1940 census, the store had closed and Quill was selling baskets (one up from apples?), but he & wife were still living with the in-laws, but now the two families in a two flat.  Probable reason? Quill's couple was now three (enter child).  James' couple was now also a three-some; James' mother-in-law, now widowed, AND the mother-in-laws mother, had both moved in with his family.  Now there were four surnames at the one address, and no apparent connection without the back story, but with the backstory, lots of places to look for husbands and more information.

Another ancestor of mine, Nathan Taylor, moved from eastern New York to northern Illinois between the 1860 & 1870 census.  I've not done much with that line.  I know the "what happened," and my TODO list includes developing a more specific time line, and hopes of information that suggests reasons for the move.

Why worry about extended families?  Often it is the clue to finding out about your direct line.   And you find some very good stories.

Till next time
Liz
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross


Friday, February 16, 2018

CENSUS FRIDAY - 1850 US Population Census

The 1850 US population census is a wonderful gift, a watershed in reporting that opened up that population and all those after it. Thank you US Government.

For those of you who may have stumbled onto this blog without being genealogically inclined, the 1850 census was the first census in which every member of the household was listed by name.  I can almost hear the discussions about the increased costs of taking the census in this manner, not only in hours spent taking the census, but also the greatly increased cost for massively more paper and ink. 

The 1840 census enumerates 29 or 30 families on one page. 
Three sequential pages of the 1850 census pages chosen at random and from Iowa, Clayton Co, Boardman Twp include, respectively, six, nine and eight households. Admittedly, the last household on the first page appears to be a boarding house; lots of different last names, but that happened.
1 page of 1840 > 3 pages of 1850.  That's the ratio for this very unscientific comparison.  It would be interesting to find the statute stating how the 1850 census would be taken. 

And I wonder how and if this difference seeded or reflected the change in how each person considered themselves?  As a member of the family, certainly, but also an individual with personal rights and duties to themselves.  Horatio Alger was still 30 years in the future, but the Civil War only 10.  Future explorations for me, or if anyone would care to comment from their knowledge?

Additionally, for all of you who have gotten to 1850 and then cried "Uncle," do a little math and go again. 
  • Everyone who was 10 or older in 1850 was alive in 1840.
  • Everyone who was alive in 1840 should have been counted.
  • Use maps (etc.) to determine where your 1850 family was in 1850.  Since farms don't move, and most of the country farmers, it's likely they are on the same piece of ground, even if the name changed. That can be a challenge.  (Hint: check county boundaries.)
  • Look for matching last names.  Do the math, allowing for deaths, older children leaving the home…
  • Celebrate -- or put the results in your "halfway" folder, as in "this is part of the answer, and I will get back to it."
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  

© 2018, SE Ross

Wednesday, February 14, 2018

E is for Era

E is for ERA – as in when did this ancestor live.  (Where is also a consideration, but for the moment considering only folks on the North American continent.) 

Bottom line: Just as in mysteries, follow the money.  The further back in time, the more you will depend upon records that concern MONEY, because those are the records that were preserved.  Within the last year I heard a lecture about a person in the 1770's.  Walking through the proof, the speaker tied in Y-DNA evidence and 127 off-line records, all but a few records having to do with land, tax, wills and probate. 

Remember, until 1850, even the census' only listed the name of the head of household, and the earliest census, 1790, is a full century plus from the first English arriving.  Land, tax, will and probate records were made as soon as "non-natives" arrived; one had to keep track of the money.  These same tax, land, will and probate records can supply the threads to tease out relationships; Michael Bates leaves only 6 silver teaspoons to his eldest daughter, Olivia, as she has already received her wedding portion, and begs that his son John will welcome Martha into his household for the remainder of her life (read wife/mother), and for this consideration gets an extra portion of land. 

A century later, in 1870, the full family will be on the census.  Names and activities can be verified with those wonderful county histories, as well as land, will, probate and tax records.  Fingers crossed that the folks you are researching had enough scratch that they made these records.  However, other changes in the 1870's impacting research in 1870 was the growth of newspapers, which, with the technology of OCR are now incredible sources for fleshing out family history, as well as finding the elusive facts. 

Happy finding…
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  

© 2018, SE Ross

Friday, February 9, 2018

C is also for Context

Context -- everything that is around the document, which speaks to its veracity, including, but not limited to, where the document was found, who made it, and why, its chain of ownership since its making, and how it came to be where you, the genealogist is examining it. 

Past that, every document is also the product of a certain time & location, and therefore has invisible tendrils connecting it to all the conditions that caused it to be created, and not only all the people it speaks of, but also all the people who were involved in its creation.  Hence, for the genealogist, that ties our research into the law of that time, the societal norms of that time, the family structure of that time, the economics of that time, etc., etc.

Just this past week, I was researching pension records, and one particular application went through several cycles before being approved.  I noticed the handwriting change dramatically between an 1879 deposition and an 1888 deposition.  The former was more slanted vertical, the latter more rounded.  The former showed evidence of the ink running out; the latter not.  That led me to do a bit of research on the pens in use, wondering when fountain pens entered the scene.

I was quite surprised that there were many patents for fountain pens in the 1850's, when they were known as reservoir pens.  They were also a true luxury, selling for around $3.00 when a box of nibs (points) was around 25 cents.  This price difference kept dip pens in use in schools until the early 1900's. 
            And the leather insets in fancy desks, or the leather middle of desk pads, were originally there providing a sturdy yet giving surface to prevent steel nibs from piercing the paper.

Happily, and bitter sweet, as in all good quests, every answer produces several new questions.  My personal TODO list now includes finding a pen with a flexible nib.  It seems that dip pens ALL had a much more flexible nib than any current standard reservoir/fountain pen, and I am interested in seeking out one to do some experimenting of my own in writing in the old style.  


Should you be interested in your own exploration of reservoir pens, googling "history of fountain pens" or some variation of that can have you reading for several hours -- and then you can progress to the pen stores!  Write me if you wish about your favorites... I favor LAMY pens.  

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

D is for Death... Certificates

"the only thing sure in life is death and taxes"

Everyone dies, and fortunately, or unfortunately, the death certificate is the one document (in the US since 1903/6) which has lots of spaces that invite information.

The doc is there and gets date and time of death right, but there are a lot of other blanks on the form, and there is no requirement that the person giving this information really knows. 

Usually reliable, due to coming from driver's license, credit card and doctor:
… the name given, though it is always good to consider nicknames, initials that have turned into a name, or a total alias (those are the truly fun ones)
… the date of death, the cause of death, and the doctor in attendance.
... last residence  
… how long sick before death.

Usually reliable because happening right then, or based on a record accepted as true by the state.  

The evidence wiggle enters with all those other blanks that just beg for information, and that information can be given by almost anyone.  Sometimes info is from close friend or family, and sometimes by the clerk who met the ambulance.

This little vagary in the information collection does not mean that death certificates should be downplayed.  Death certificates are truly wonderful wonderful records, with lots of facts to plug into our family tree, but sometimes also  contain, along with the true, the probably, the possibly and sometimes the "huh?"

A lot depends on context (remember that letter? -- oh yeah, it's coming on Friday).

You got the medical stuff - and name and date.  Now look down at the bottom of the form.

Have a good look at the name of the informant. Every death certificate that I have seen has this line down near the bottom, and the tendency is to disregard this name.  Please don't.  This name is working very hard to tell you the source of the information past the "medical-at time of death" stuff.   When the informant is close family -- spouse, parent, sib, or child -- the information tends to be good/valid/true; the family knows brother/father/grandad Brian's birthday & year; they celebrated it.  His sibs would know the name of Brian's father and mother, that's grandpa or grandma.

At the other end of the reliability scale is the often noted "hospital registrar," who got their information from the next door neighbor of the now dead guy.  The exception to this rule is a small town hospital, where the registrar has known everything about everyone in the town since they were born, and if the registrar doesn't know, his/her auntie will know, and the registrar will call her with any questions before finishing and filing the certificate.

Another context to consider is how the person died.  A traumatic death of a child may result in errors even from a parent, specifically because they are the parent.   My grandmother misspelled her own name on the death certificate of her daughter who died at 2 months.

My bottom line is to put the information in -- but possibly not in ink.  

Other stories to enjoy and consider: mine and second-hand.
  • The death certificates of four brothers, all long lived, outliving their spouses and children, and not living near each other, did not agree on the names of parents or their birthplaces.  It was clear that the information was coming from friends or neighbors; there was no family.  The solution, and definitive information came when the death certificate was found for the fifth son, who died young, and was buried by his parents.  Did they know their names, her maiden name and the towns they were born in? Absolutely!  Case closed. 

  • My death certificate in my family has the father's name as Arthur Oakley Lucas.  Nice name, only problem is that Oakley was the street where father lived.  A family member (like me) reading this will recognize the error and it will not enter the codex of on-line family trees, but if others start with that death certificate. ???

  •  Also, a European town of birth may only and always have been heard by the children.  In my family, one side came from Bruneholdshime, in Germany.  I had much better luck when I went phonetic, and looked for Brunnholzheim.
               Ditto for mother's maiden names.


Cheers -
Liz

Ps - death certificates are also very handy for lineage societies!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on Tuesday and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross