Friday, January 15, 2021

Another wrinkle on citations –

Citations are designed to let the reader (and in 10 years, you, the author) know where a bit of information was found. 
Different sources are cited differently, and that is not the subject of this post.
Citations themselves can be written differently, and that also is not the subject of this post.

This post offers a sidebar on how to record, as you are researching, what information a document, a narrative, a newspaper article, includes for later quick reference. From around 1910 until now, birth information is most often found in a birth certificate, death in a death certificate, and marriage in a marriage certificate. Line up a row of birth, marriage, and death certificates, and your family is laddered into a huge tree.

Earlier, not so much. And the earlier the time, the fewer records. Marriage records go back decades, and sometimes there are christening records. Before that…again, not so much.

So where do the facts come from? From tax records, from deeds, and from newspapers. (and that’s another huge set of blogs.)


                [I am a convert to “write/cite” and offer many bows and thank yous to the inventors, teachers and discussers of this technique who have taught me and shared wisdom informally; it’s a very long list.  
                However, that technique does not speak directly to the case of re-finding, quickly and easily, which article of the 157+ saved holds the information on birthday, residence or relationship.  Hence, a new wrinkle.]


Many sources include useful information which is often not reflected in the title of the article. How could the relevant facts be tracked, especially when the number of sources numbered in the hundreds; memory is good, but has its limits. 

Once the following solution presented itself, it was however, a “duh,” and an “of course.”


I put each source on its own page. Paper is cheap; electronic paper is even cheaper.
  1. The page is topped by the citation – or all the info that will become the citation.
  2. Next comes a snip of the source – or the whole source if it is small.
  3. Next, if the snip is handwritten, or difficult to read, a transcription.
So far, cite/write… and not my idea/invention

        4. Then – and this is the only new thought of the mix – a list, in whatever font size is very easy to read when glancing at that page, on screen or on paper, of those things in this source that speak to the question or situation being explored.

So… when the question is building the Ferguson tree (a personal project) a social tidbit about Mrs. Webb from Bryan, Texas visiting her father Eugene [Ferguson] in Bloomington is of GREAT interest. Published in June 4, 1934, this 4- line squib offers that Mrs. Webb is the daughter of Eugene, that she lives in Texas, he lives in Bloomington, Ill.

And the page after #3 would look like this (below):

  • · June 4, 1934
  • · Mrs. Webb daughter of Eugene (ferguson)
  • · Mrs. Webb lives in Bryan, Texas  --- [look into her marriage]
  • · Eugene lives in Bloomington, Illinois.

If you find this useful, wonderful. If not, of course keep doing what you have been doing.
Peace.



TA
-----------

Since last time: Writing up a storm and using #4 (above) to keep straight all the bits and pieces.  Looking forward to SLIG in a week, and enjoying the posts from this week of SLIG.

Friday, December 18, 2020

Chickens Come Home To Roost.

Let's be brutally honest.  I suspect I am not the only one with at least some disordered documents - loosely sorted stacks (paper) and/or roughly labeled files (electronic). I also suspect that I am also not the only one using the time without FHL and Archives (and research trips!!) to explore all the nooks and crannies of house and computer, in the hope of exhuming semi-lost items and mostly forgotten wonderfuls.  

A part of me is thinking of Carter peering into Tut's tomb.. "I see wonders." 

Some time ago, I saw the touring exhibit on the most recent finds at Pompei.  Among the artifacts was a delicate gold necklace with shaped dangles, continuous and graduated.  Behind me I heard the murmur, how did they do that?  

It just takes time.  


My computer includes county histories, hundreds of newspaper clips, documents and snips about every aspect of life.   Now has come the reckoning.  Now is the time to order and arrange.

Can do. 

It just takes time. 
        

The goal is to make things findable, so I tweek the alphabet.  When I label a file or a document and use the family name in the titling, I double the first initial, ala RROSS or DDASING.  While it is unlikely that DASING would come up in a search as part of a word, ROSS gets many hits as partial words.  

I label by the BIG branch - so RROSS also includes the women/men who marry into that line, the names Wilkey, Shirley, Barbee, Compton.  CCOMPTON will probably graduate into its own line when I open up that line sideways. Rebecca was born in Virginia, married in Tennessee, and died in Illinois. She promises a great story; her family line ties into a land grant from Lord Fairfax.  How cool is that!!

Back to the piles  -- afterall, lockdown will be over in only 5 months. 


TA... 

++++++++++++

on other shores: Earlier this month, I submitted my paperwork for DAR membership.  My grandmother was a member; she joined during the 1920's.   Paperwork for her does not cover current requirements; lucky that I'm a genealogist and can find the missing information.  I am kept in the loop on local chapter doings, and have joined in writing cards for overseas soldiers, and sponsoring cemetery wreaths for vets.

Also, am now officially an elected member of the Illinois State Genealogical Society board, and a member of the education committee.  Laura, past president and current chair of this committee has a large vision for activities for this committee.  It promises to be an exciting time.  Stay tuned for news. If you are in Illinois and not a member, consider joining.  In fact, if you are not in Illinois, follow and consider joining - with everything via zoom during Covid, you can live virtually anywhere.  What a bonus.

and finally-- and a Happy to you, wherever and whatever you celebrate --  




Monday, December 14, 2020

Dead People Have No Rights -- (though they may well have copyrights!)


Reviewing the underpinnings, with some comments.


Dates:   DAY(1,2,3 etc.)  MONTH (Jan., Feb., Mar. etc.) YEAR (4, repeat 4 digits) 

            Why?  My cousin got a birthday card from a friend in Belgium on June 6. My cousin's birthday is June 1.  That's why.  6/10 is ambiguous. 10 May points to one specific day in the year.  Why 4 digits for the year?  When research stretches into 3 centuries, though you know you will remember that a certain snip is from 1820 and not 1920, I guarantee you won't. 

                Also interesting, and good to know, between 1582 & 1752 both Julian and Gregorian calendar were in use, depending on where. Genealogists get to juggle double dates, which is particularly interesting when calculating ages. More info here. [1]  

Names: Record as you would introduce - Maggie Thompson, Roger Anderson,  Douglas Scott.  Why?  With this convention, one does not wonder whether Douglas Scott is Mr. Scott or Mr. Douglas.  

Places: Small to large or large to small.  Ancestry offers small to large in their drop-downs; Family Search prefers Large to small when you fill in the catalog box.  For your own work, choose one (either) and stay there.  (Please include the county, sometimes it makes a difference when trying to work out a puzzle.)   Why?  Lots of cities share names with counties, and counties with states, and lots of city names are in more than one state.  Hence, Hartford, Washington Co., New York.
      
Living People & Privacy: Genealogical databases blank out vital statistics on living people.  This action, unfortunately, hardly needs a why.  Stolen identities and hacked everything require diligence, for ourselves, our families and those whose information we tend, both online and on paper.  

Dead People Have No Rights:  Unfortunately true.  Small rant here.  My mother died in April.  I have a tree on Ancestry, but the youngest person included, and long dead, is my grandmother.  Three days after my mother died, Ancestry planted a snapshot of her on my home page.  I do not know where the person ID'd as the contributor got this snapshot and he has not replied to any post through Ancestry.  Annoyed hardly starts to cover it. 
            However, dead people do continue to hold copyright. Current copyright law gives ownership of writings (and other creations) made on or after January 1, 1978 to the creator for their life plus 70 years. Interestingly enough, a letter's content still belongs to the writer, while the physical item belongs to the recepient, who may give away, sell or display the letter, but not publish. [2]
            Who would have thunk that?

TA... 

----------------------------
1. An interesting article is posted on the Connecticut Library Site. Google: Connecticut State 
    Library >  History & Genealogy > Colonial Records & Topics > 1752 Calendar Change. 
2. Roam around Copyright Alliance:  https://copyrightalliance.org/about/

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
since last posting: the tree is up and the larder is being stocked with celebratory food for Christmas and NY eve -- smoked salmon, herring in wine, "smelly" cheese.  You'd think we were Scandanavian (not!).  Education continues. With more than 3/4 of my lines leaping to Germany and the encouragement of a colleague, I have started DuoLingo.German, learning what I could have absorbed as a youngster. My grandmother spoke German but wouldn't speak it/teach it to her daughter (my mother).  Grandma often said, "We are in America. We are Americans. We speak English."  So I know the sounds, from songs and food names, but the language is being found again.   

Wednesday, December 9, 2020

Pencil, Paper, Films & Books

Back in the day, the first activity of a newbie genealogist was writing the details of their nuclear family into a lineage chart and a family group sheet.  Then the lineage chart parents sprouted branches for the grandparents, and two more family group sheets appeared. By this time the newbie had met the US census, and grabbed info from films, which taught geography and which also required learning how to use indexes, and probably soundex.  

Next steps included getting paper (official documents) to certify the information from family birthday books and "Aunt Sally" rememberings.  Birth & death certificates, marriage licenses, and pictures of gravestones joined the growing paper collection.  If lucky, many family documents were in the bottom drawer of the filing cabinet in the back bedroom.  If not, getting these documents meant travel to the issuing county or letters with checks. Luck in genealogy friends and casual mentors encouraged full and careful readings of these documents, and embedded hints directed future explorations. To this mix, the newbie would add in a local genealogy group, a few lectures, a weekend conference or two, reading and time.  In a bit, training wheels were left off. 


The amazing thing, however, is that "back in the day" is not 1860 or even 1950.  Back in the day was 30 years ago.  My first steps in genealogy were as written above.  I wrote letters.  I traveled to courthouses. I spent hours with the entire US census on microfilm at the Great Lakes NARA (73rd & Pulaski, Chicago).   I copied census pages longhand, (xeroxed census pages were rarely legible) and xeroxed book pages when in libraries (or more often wrote transcriptions).   Gathered information was studied closely at home, and notes kept track of future searchings. 

 

Today... "way different" is putting it mildly.  Open up a program, enter your parent's and grandparent's names and out pops a family tree of multiple generations.  When you claim them and title this assemblage with your name, the computer program starts sending hints, and an invitation is extended to add these new names to your tree. AI and other people supply you with ancestors; it's like pushing the STAPLES easy button. Do I use these big data bases, absolutely, with many thanks for all the records gathered, and never more than during this strange year.  I use these data bases to supply some of the documents that "in the before" were available only at the ancestor's hometown courthouse, or transcribed or abstracted in reference books available only in large collections.  


Anyway, back to the way back machine. Technology may move into computers that take dictation, rather than fingers on keys, but reasoning still directs what is recorded. The human brain still offers the best network for doing solid genealogy, and reviewing the underpinnings from time to time reminds.


General comments about research:

  • Move from the known to the unknown
  • Test every hypothesis
  • Look carefully at all information available
  • The further back, the fewer records
  • Decide early (like today) how you are going to keep your information
  • Full recording of where you got the info ("citing your sources") is VERY VERY VERY important

 

General comments about forms for the info:

  • Record dates – 5 Sept 1897
  • Record names – Margaret Simpson 
  • Record places – Chicago, Cook, Illinois
  • Living people have the right to their privacy – name/dates/locations
  • Dead people have no rights 

 

Stay tuned for continuing coverage on these guidelines.  No specific order or schedule. 

If all this is thoroughly known and you feel you could write the next blogs, you still might want to check in every so often.  Other topics will enter the stream.  


(Similar comments were written in 2019, and found last week while "wandering about" my computer looking for documents saved a bit too hastily. (see above about deciding how to keep information.)  Not surprising if you have heard some version of this before, and you may hear some version of this in the future from another, but sometimes a reminder and a fresh voice is a good thing.) 

++++++++++++++

since last posting. I am writing for my portfolio, yet, still, continuing, (choose your own word).  Yes, I have taken extensions.  Currently filling in the squares on the KDP lineage/generations.  This is a family I have been living with and collecting tidbits about for almost 30 years, so ... many choices about what to include and what to save for the book.  Continuing my education with conferences, webinars and various discussion groups, enjoying and learning from all. Honing my craft & working --- speaking to local gen groups, and writing.  

TA... 

Wednesday, November 18, 2020

I Love Learning.

 As said before, I love learning -- always have. 

 

And... while I'm growing a bit weary of my small physical universe, my home is comfortable, and I am grateful for heat and light and no earthquakes or hurricanes.

 

I am also very grateful for the internet, which connects me to FamilySearch, Ancestry, and other databases -- and allows my continuing curiosity walking room.  I go down rabbit holes, and explore for friends, but also have used this time to get much more schooling. 

 

Currently I am enrolled in Pro-Gen, an esteemed on-line genealogy course, which seeks to teach the many aspects of a working genealogist's life, both the business side and the "book-learning" research side.  Every month includes projects, and last month’s project was a research report.  

 

A genealogical research report concerns itself with determining relationships, as in "Who is the father of 'x'", "Is 'x' the brother of 'y'? or separating people who share the same name, as in "was Isaac Jacobs, merchant, b. 1847 or Isaac Jacobs, carpenter, b. 1850, the husband of Polly Thomas, b. 1853?

 

But… since the assignment was “a research report” there was a bit of latitude in choosing the subject.  I used the opportunity to spend time on a question that has been sitting (literally) on my shelf for at least 15 years.  My report investigated a set of documents found decades ago by my mother, who lived in Virginia.  She was an avid estate and garage sale attendee, had a 10 year old’s curiosity with the cash to satisfy, and much followed her home. During one visit, she showed me a bag of "stuff," and asked if I would like it.  I would.  

 

The bag was full of wonders – a book covered in green velvet, a small leather covered "pocketbook," 2 postcards, etchings, a folded speech, and a single chapbook journal with notes from a whaling voyage.  Researching for the report linked all but the journal with Leroy MiltonYale.  He was a physician, the son of a physician, and noted as a pediatrician. He was also a proficient amateur etcher, who started the New-York Etching Club and was its first President 1877-1879. 

            As said, research was able to attach all but the journal into the timeline of Yale’s life, and all the pieces fit without pushing. The journal did not fit. There is no account of adventurous travel in Yale’s life, but against that, the 2-3 year period during which this voyage took place (1886-1888/89) is only lightly sketched in the public accounts of Yale’s life.


           

            Another tidbit.  His mother’s brother was Richard Luce, a mariner (read whaler), who lived in Leroy’s household when Leroy was young.  However, the journal carries comments that the author was a greenhorn, which could hardly have been whaler Richard Luce, and the journal includes drawings, which could tie the journal to Leroy.  And if not Leroy, what prompted the attachment to Leroy artifacts for over 150 years?

 

Am I curious? Absolutely!  

            Plan to look into NUCMC, the New Bedford Whaling Museum, and ?  Any and all suggestions gratefully received and will be acknowledged should this make the public stage. Email is RossGen360@outlook.com. 

 

Do return. Updates about this... and writing about much else.  As said by another, "Genealogy is fun." 

 

++++++++++

on other shores: Neither 2019 or 2020 had many posts; I was doing a lot of family tending.  My mother started declining Sept 2018, moved close to us in December 2018, and died in April 2020. We are near the end of tending the paperwork of her estate, but there is much to do before settling the paperwork of her family history legacy, 100’s of pictures, some labeled, some not – and notes from her research trips and letters with Ross genealogists across the country.  For those of you on or anticipating this journey, peace and light.   As estate paperwork eases, my posts will be more regular. 

Thursday, October 8, 2020

fun now - for september party !! GENEAQUEST !!! (oops... long over!!)


SO.... this post got lost in the trenches.... and today is 8 October.
Geneaquest 2020 was a great conference -- I really enjoyed doing the GeneaBars - Civil War Pensions, Dealing with Brick Walls, Lineage Societies.  And enjoyed being on the other side of the footlights on Saturday listening to the lectures.  Keep your ears perked for Geneaquest 2022.

Recent doings:     Upgraded my gear.  Audio: From laptop built-ins to wired boom mike headset. Added the "apple" wired ears, and just recently, wireless earpods (GREAT, and really appreciate the stretch factor when going to a day of lectures.)
    My computer 'grew'; I've added 5" to the depth of my desk, and sat a large monitor on it, and, after what seemed like a lifetime of waiting, have a separate camera sitting on the big screen.  Now I'm getting the office version of two-foot-itis, (own a 20' boat, want a 22'), and thinking about a second big screen. 
    Why the catalog of recent spending?  A reminder to myself (and maybe an encouragement/reminder to you?) that these tools are how I stay working and learning, and connect, and even more so now.  For the next 'x' months, nearly all my interaction with ... everything, anything... will be virtual.  There is enough angst in research & speaking/writing well, and choosing precise words for the thought/concept.  Good tools don't change the work, but good tools can decrease the drag coefficient. Nuff.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

GENEAQUEST 2020

Geneaquest is a conference that CAGGNI (Computer Assisted Genealogy Group of Northern Illinois) (say that 5 times fast) puts together every two years.  Last time, in 2018, I gave my lecture on finding women. This time, not surprisingly, I am in the planning up to my eyeballs.

As you can see, registration is now open.  Do come.  It's VIRTUAL (of course!!). and 2... count it 2 days rather than one.  Is this an ad.... yes, but an ad in a good cause.  Hit their site, and you can get all the details, I'll continue to talk about behind the scenes, and the why.

You should come because:  (and bring at least one friend... )
  • Probably not much planned yet for September
  • Price point is better than a lot of stuff hitting the screen -- $40 members/$45 non-members 
  • Add on DNA primer for +$15 Friday afternoon (yes, add-on to Sat only)
  • GeneaUS Bar - Friday morning.  Bonus for early registrants. (I'm doing three sessions if you want to come see)
  • Virtual Lunch tables with your buds or a speaker - again - first come.
  • Give-aways.  Door-prizes. 
Why would you want to be anywhere else?  














Wednesday, June 17, 2020

the world of genealogy .... BASICS


The world of genealogy –
Every “doing” has its own world – activities & vocabulary.  For most Americans, sports is an obvious one.  For most men, cars, and for most women, cooking &/or fashion.

Genealogy is a world that few learn from their parents.  Possibly good, in that all the forms and procedures are a learned language, and so all more easily done with the same ‘accent’.  Possibly bad, in that it is something slightly scary, and one more time grab for busy schedules.

Anyway, back to basic forms and procedures.  I have been lecturing on various topics for over 10 years, (researching over 30) and include some form of the following in every lecture. 

General comments about research:
  • Move from the known to the unknown
  • Test every hypothesis
  • Look at all information available
  • The further back, the fewer records
  • Decide early (like today) (or better yet, yesterday) how you are going to keep your information
  • Citing your sources is VERY VERY VERY important

General comments about the info:
  • Record dates – 5 Sept 1897
  • Record names – Margaret SIMPSON
  • Record places – Chicago, Cook, Illinois
  • Living people have the right to their privacy – name/dates/locations

Through the next months of blogs, each comment gets its own attention!  Stay tuned.
++++++++++++++++++
ps. Jill Morelli ends each of her blogs with a list of what she has done since the last blog.  I like that idea so much (personal tally list, "it's not all bon-bons") it's going to appear on at the end of my blogs.  Thank you Jill. 

COVID TIMES & GENEALOGY --

I like learning.  Always have. 

As a kid, a lot of learning came through books.  I was the kid who begged parents to leave the hall light on and my door open, not because of any fear of the dark, but because I couldn't get my hands on a flashlight, and I wanted to keep reading. "my best friend is the person who owns a book I haven't read"  me & Abe Lincoln...

If you're here, you know me from genealogy, but I did exist and do interesting in the before.  I was a musician... So how did I end up as a musician?  Because I could read, and read way above my grade level.  It was determined that I could miss "reading" one time a week to take a music lesson in 4th grade. So I did - again, learning.  And that field expanded and stuck through university and 2 master's degrees.

To finish the rundown on my mostly music ...  I ran /directed a concert series (8 years), wrote grant applications that got grants, won by audition tenured cello positions in three regional professional orchestras, played festivals, gigged much, taught private studio and university, composed, arranged.  I was guest artist for recitals & concertos.  During grad school I engaged an accountant to present “How to keep books as an independent contractor,” for performance majors.  I also caused a minor furor with a recital encore of “The Swan” when I invited volunteer ‘swans’ clothed in short white cassocks to dance free form during the piece.  Sadly, no video exists. Recitals were only taped, and camera phones didn’t exist.

               An unexpected injury in 2017 ended professional level playing; I moved quickly into professional genealogy full time.  No TV soaps for me.  Genealogy was already in play, I was doing a monthly workshop at my library, and I found a new rhythm.  I was lucky that so many skills transferred. From my father I had learned to analyze, think, & write. He also encouraged mental flexibility.  From my mother I learned to explore and welcome the new.  From music I brought self-motivation, the chops to read old handwriting, the ability to apply theory to real-life (and vice versa), organizational skills, research skills, and the mental focus to work long, hard and accurately.

So... now the world is in a new age... hibernating & virtual.  This may be a permanent change, or for awhile.  Either way, in my world, TV soaps are still not included.  The genealogy world was a bit resistant to adopt virtual processes that were already standard, if not common, in business, but it was time to latch onto the technology or return to doing NOTHING for the duration.  

You see Facebook and your gen societies, and what the national conferences have done, and will be doing the rest of 2020 - and into 2021 - and ?  And the upshot is that the things that were virtual (pro-gen, Legacy Family lectures) just keep on doing, the national conferences (NGS & FGS) are going virtual, institutes are going virtual (GRIP, SLIG), and individual ventures (CDG, etc.)

So... now, from the comfort of your own home (as the phrase goes), one can travel the country, or the world, learning, seeing, and growing as a genealogist. 

so far since March 2020 I have attended.. and all virtual .... 
Conferences: St. Louis, NGS, FGS (maybe/it's sept) 
Institutes: GRIP, 2 weeks
Courses: Pro-Gen, starting in June for 14 months
Discussion: NSGQ Discussion, 1xmonth during 2020, CDG Alumni, 1xweek; knitting/books, 2x/month; 

and I am involved with the Sept 2020 staging of a virtual (first time out virtual) conference - GeneaQuest - product of CAGGNI (chg suburb group).  I am on the planning committee, and wrangling the vendors, and will be a member of the GeneUS Bar during the conference.  (?check us out on facebook?  ??come??!!).  Learning curve is steep and exciting - and we are doing it. 

And I am also venturing out a bit on my own.  From 2014 to 2018, the local library sponsored me for "2nd Saturday Genealogy."  This included a teaching a topic with handouts, fielding questions that walked in the door, and learning from each other.  I loved doing this, and have missed it, and in the years, people moved, so they couldn't come... so, with virtual the new flavor on the block, I thought of seeing how this could work.  Plan is to do the 3rd Friday of every month at 2 pm.  I've written the people I've touched through 2nd Sat or lecturing, and will venture forth in 3 days - this Friday.  If you contacted me w/ your email, you will get an invite to the zoom meeting.  

If you haven't gotten the "are you interested" letter from me, leave a note for me here; I think it's possible.  

hows my crystal ball? 

I see the future of genealogy having to keep the virtual aspect of society meetings -- 
I see the future of conferences incorporating some virtual aspects - 
I see genealogists getting easy with Zoom - both attending and leading.  

we all remember, "to infinity, and beyond!"   



Wednesday, July 3, 2019

it pays to sleep in a dorm !

This is a very quick blog - to register the gift of the universe in serendipity and wonder.   And to say thank-you to many people.

As many of you know (and now all of you) I have been chewing through preparing my portfolio for BCG certification for awhile.  The timetable changed, more than once, but was never abandoned. 

[NB. I am currently on the clock, with my due date 6 May 2020, so I am saying May 1 to myself.  This is an absolutely positively FIRM date.  If I were to renew for another year (which is possible), I would instantly be subject to a new set of requirements, which in turn would require reworking, if not re-doing a number of things.  Not going there, period paragraph.]

Was at June 2019 GRIPitt for a week of learning/honing my skill in writing proofs, a basic building block of genealogists.  A wonderful course, learned much, and still integrating the learning.
           Hence, the sleeping in the dorm.  Note: dorms have come up in the world; this one was ensuite! 

Also... meeting many wonderful people - including Sandy - who told me about an on-line course run by Jill Morelli that goes through portfolio prep with the real deal - not hypotheticals or verbal comparisons of the rubrics.  Fantastic! and my name is on the wait list for the course.  I couldn't be more delighted. (Obviously, my fingers are way big crossed.)

Thank you universe - and all the names you are known by. 

Thursday, February 28, 2019

MOVE.....


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       Write it
       Shoot it
       Publish it
       Crochet it
       Saute it
       Whatever
       Make
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From Josh Whedon, Creator of Firefly

Monday, February 18, 2019

S is for is for Saving... & S is for Surfacing

>> S is for Serendipity

From Miriam-Webster, an official definition of serendipity is, "the faculty or phenomenon of finding valuable or agreeable things not sought for."  I, going shorter, would say that serendipity is between "wow" and "whoopee," and that serendipity makes for some of the best stories to trade.  

If you don't have a collection of these, just keep researching.  



Serendipity #1: A few years ago, I was in McLean, Va., visiting my mother, and went to the local FHL.  The gent tending was not, by his own comment, a genealogist; he did, however, ask what name I was researching.   When I said, “Rentchler, downstate Illinois,” he said, “Rentchler, California.” …. And we realized that we are cousins.  The brother of my Rentchler went to California, and the library tender is a descendent of that person, Marshall Rentchler.  I am a descendent of the son who stayed home in Belleville, Henry L. Rentchler.

Serendipity #2: In the 1980’s I was researching in Ft. Wayne, In. with my mother, and commented to her that “look… Patrick joined Manerva’s church 8 months before they were married.”  A gent at the next table made comment to me that it was common for the beau to join his lady’s church some months before marriage, so they could be married in her church. 

Serendipity #3:  In 1964, an oral history was taken about two very very small Illinois towns, Belle Rive and Dahlgren, resulting in a book titled (no great surprise here) "The History of Belle Rive and Dahlgren, Illinois" and put in the Mt. Vernon library.  In 1998, to aide my own research, I made an every name index of this book, and published it online.  In 2018, my colleague and friend mentioned that he had people from that area.  It turns out that one of the interviews was given by his great aunt, who he knew, though he had no knowledge of this book!  (ps-the index is still on-line)

Serendipity #4: The first time to Mt. Vernon library (IL), with my mother to research my father's line, we were pointed at a researcher across the room.  The librarian thought that she knew about the Ross’.  Indeed she did!  Her GG and my GGG were sisters – Sarah Nooner & Rebecca Barbee – both originally Comptons, and born Manassas, VA. 

   ... and the "wow" factor continues.  My cousin, a Ross, married a woman born and raised in Manassas, VA, who, though she doesn’t have any Comptons in her line (to her knowledge) did comment that there were many Comptons in her school.  (and GGG gets the line back to the early 1800s!!)

Serendipity, at this point and for me, is genealogy’s four leaf clover.  Keep your eyes (and ears) open, and it may just find you ---
++++++++++++++++++++++

>> S is for surfacing 
You may notice that my last post was Sept 6, 2018.  On Sept 7, 2018, I was on a plane headed to Va. to tend my mother.  Sitting in a hospital or rehab is not the best place for the creative musing or applied thinking/writing that goes into a blog.  Ta-da.  No writing for 5 months.  The extra time until today, and being able to get “back on the blog” were used arranging her move to Chicago and settling many things. 
       
I am looking forward to months, even years, with much less excitement. 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 began with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on most Tuesdays and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.   2019 continues to finish the alphabet.  Then ??? -- any suggestions?
© 2019, SE Ross

Thursday, September 6, 2018

Q is for Questions: R is for Results


It is the question which propels us.  From our earliest days, to the meaning of life at the end, we ask questions, and, if we are lucky, we have the time and the means to answer at least a few.

Genealogists answer questions regarding an individual's identity, and the relationship of one individual to another.   Along the way, and sometimes in order to substantiate a relationship many "facts" about individuals are discovered.

Results, for a genealogist, is that which answers the asked question (specific or implied) about the relationship and/or identity of a specific individual.


Answering a semi-global question about an individual may require many contributary questions, which will each have their own results - which may in turn spawn more questions before a satisfactory result is developed (rarely just found), to the large question.

My grandfather taught at Keewatin academy.  There is no book or even magazine article about this school.  Through multiple newspaper ads, listings in catalogs of schools, and comments about former students of Keewatin, it was possible to determine specifics about the school.   30 different sources and at least that many footnotes for a paragraph in the final document.

So…. Ask those questions…. And seek results !!!


Till next time,
Liz

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on most Tuesdays and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross

Tuesday, August 21, 2018

O is for Oh Wow!!!


We've all had them. 

The deed which describes the piece of land bought by your ancestor that fits the space in the map,
The German church book entry which bridges the Atlantic to your great-grandparents and lists 3 more generations
The discovery of stillbirths and suicides and divorces which illuminates family dynamics, and on and on and on. 

Everyone who has done genealogy for more than three minutes knows the joy and the satisfaction of these finds.

(N.B. -- and… so you don't end up having to relive that "oh, wow!" moment way more often than you would wish, strive to develop -- even as that OhWowMoment develops -- a way of recording where the OW was found.  What you record may or may not be ESM, but it should be enough that you can find the OWM document again, even if the "citation" is not enough to write an formal citation without looking at the document a second time.)

O is also for "Oh My…,"  learning/knowing a bit more about the actions of your ancestors.  For good or ill, these people 100+ years ago were people.  Someone comparing philosophy said that the major difference between then and now was electricity.  True enough, but electricity alone had many spin-offs, including how far one could travel in a day, how homes were heated and lit, and how shoes were made…, and where shoes were made.

And so…. I am circled back to one of my beloved themes… Genealogy/history as time travel. 

Till next time
Liz

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on most Tuesdays and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  

© 2018, SE Ross

Thursday, July 19, 2018

M is for Mitochondrial DNA


Could have tackled this topic right off the bat during "D" as in DNA, but didn't. 

DNA is the new kid on the block in genealogy.  It's even more exciting than the next census.  Ancestry.com started DNA in 1983, according to Google.

I say at the outset that while I understand how the three tests work - autosomal, mitochondrial and Y-chromosome - I have yet to get excited about DNA, though I know lots of people who are very excited, and spending lots of time learning how to construct the science, especially that of autosomal DNA comparisons.

I will say that in the last 2 months I have heard info that leads me to be a bit more interested in autosomal, and I join those who are glad there may be another avenue for cold cases, but so far, the DNA tests that truly intrigue me are mitochondrial and Y-chromosome.

Quick review:
Mitochondrial DNA, the 'x' chromosome,  is passed mother to daughter to daughter to daughter… etc., though the last generation can be either daughter or son.
The incredible thing about the 'x' chromosome is that unlike most of DNA, it does not combine and divide with each child and generation.  It remains, being passed from generation and eon to eon as it is.  Rarely, very very rarely, there is a mutation, and then that mutation stays for the next several eons.

The same is true for the Y-chromosome, the male chromosome, which is passed father to son to son…etc., and ONLY to sons, so even the last generation must be male. 
Repeat:  The incredible thing about the 'x' chromosome is that unlike most of DNA, it does not combine and divide with each child and generation.  It remains, being passed from generation and eon to eon as it is.  Rarely, very very rarely, there is a mutation, and then that mutation stays for the next several eons.

We talk about lines "daughtering out" with reference to the disappearance of the last name, but the Y-chromosome can just as easily daughter out.   Likewise, a family line of all sons ends that line for the X-chromosome.


Looking ahead:  What intrigues me is the vast reaches of time that these two DNA tests,  Mitochondrial and Y-chromosome, have the capability of bridging.  My "Ross" is presumed to come from Scotland, either directly, or by way of Ireland.  The earliest fixed date in the US is 1824/25 figured from the age Patrick Ross gave on his enlistment in 1861 for the Civil War.  Given that he was born in Knox, Tenn, I hold small hope of finding paper to carry him back.  I hold small hope that the Y-chromosome test taken by my brother will link with someone in UK, but after years of searching for paper and finding nothing, my small hope of a DNA link to UK is slightly bigger than my small hope of finding paper.

Three companies do autosomal tests; one does X & Y.  Have a look and save your pennies.

Till next time,
Liz

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on most Tuesdays and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross

L is for local/regional doings -- take 2


NB - I saw this post in my working basket, and thought it had not been posted.  A few weeks have passed since the CAGGNI conference, and MUCH in my life has happened.  This post was worth a second look, and I hope you think the same.)

A few weeks ago I spoke at the CAGGNI conference.  Held every two years northwest of Chicago, it is a daylong affair run by CAGGNI (Computer Assisted Genealogy Group of Northern Illinois). The conference has 4 time slots and 4 topics during each time slot.  Speakers are nationally & regionally known; this year the class lineup included a hands on option for DNA learning.  (and yes, they took walk-in registrants).

NGS, FGS, RootsTech & PMC are the big national conferences, and they are wonderful.  I got to NGS in May, and hope to be at more during 2018.  I do hope that you get to one (or more) every so often.
It's carnival time with all the vendors, many who offer info and answer questions.  (Where else can you get help with RootsMagic or Family Tree Maker or ask the Ancestry folk why something is doing what it is doing?)
It's carnival time meeting people you know from other conferences -- often by chance.  I met a friend/fellow genealogist from Alaska.  We last met January of 2017? or was it 2016? 

At the same time, (returning to the topic) let us not neglect the regional conferences.  Societies put an enormous amount of effort into sponsoring a conference, one day or two.   Speakers are good, and in addition to the day of learning, there are the vendors (jewelry, t-shirts & bumperstickers), the society reps (DAR, SAR), the library reps (Newberry, Mid-Cont), and the social time during coffee breaks and over lunch.

Consider attending a regional conference as part of vacation travel.  Societies generally pull from regional speakers, so you will hear people that rarely (or never) get to your part of the country.  If the conference is where your family came from, some of the people attending may be relatives.  (do your homework?)

My take home in this post is "don't discount the 1-2 day conferences."  Yes, national/huge is lots of fun & has lots to offer, but regional/local, while smaller/shorter, also offers much.  Don't write them off.

Till next time,
Liz

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2018 begins with an "ABC-darium," a walk through the alphabet expanding into short comments on matters genealogical.  Published on most Tuesdays and some Fridays, a letter may be visited more than once before moving on.  
© 2018, SE Ross